On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 01:02:24 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Generally speaking, you can divide applications into the ones that > will be allowed to influence ths system's behavior with respect to > power management and the others that won't be allowed to do it. The > latter may be forcibly "frozen" (this way or another) when the > "trused" ones collectively decide it's a good idea to enter a deeper > "energy saving" state. However, it is not a given that specific > applications will always be in the same group. They may be "trusted" > on some systems and they may not be "trusted" on some other system, > depending on the configuration etc. That even may change over time > on the same system. > it might even be a sliding scale; the voting rights don't have to be "0" and "1", but could also be "0.2" and such.... _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
