Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > I should have made a stronger point:
> "power-aware" is _not_ a good
> > > term for these applications. 

Strongly disagree.  The whole point is that they
ARE VERY MUCH AWARE and interact with a power
policy to achieve goals.

Like refusing to power down active subsystems,
or actively powering down inactive ones.
Q.E.D. ... "aware".


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux