On Friday, July 30, 2010, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > Check for ACPI _OSC object is heavier than other checks in > acpi_pci_osc_control_set(). So move it after the other checks. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> OK Rafael > --- > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6.35-rc6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.35-rc6.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > +++ linux-2.6.35-rc6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > @@ -388,10 +388,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acp > acpi_handle tmp; > struct acpi_pci_root *root; > > - status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_OSC", &tmp); > - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > - return status; > - > control_req = (flags & OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS); > if (!control_req) > return AE_TYPE; > @@ -400,6 +396,10 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acp > if (!root) > return AE_NOT_EXIST; > > + status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_OSC", &tmp); > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > + return status; > + > mutex_lock(&osc_lock); > /* No need to evaluate _OSC if the control was already granted. */ > if ((root->osc_control_set & control_req) == control_req) > > > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
