On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Kevin Hilman >><khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Kevin Hilman >>>> <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Mikael Pettersson wrote: >>>>>> Eric Miao writes: >>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Kevin Hilman >>>>>> > <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> > > On ARM platforms, power management can be very platform specific. >>>>>> > > This patch allows ARM subarches to extend the platform_device >>>>>> > > pdev_archdata for each subarch by creating a new struct pdev_machdata >>>>>> > > and allowing each subarch to customize it as needed. >>Do you remember what happened with this patch? > > I don't have all the details in front of me because I'm on my phone, but I advised against pdev_archdata because it is multiplatform-unfriendly. Ok, I did not expect that. =) But after thinking a bit it does make sense. I wonder what my options are. I'm not so fond of the idea to wrap the platform devices - that's not more multi-platform friendly, is it? How about using devres and platform bus notifiers? For a Runtime PM prototype using devres (instead of pdev_archdata or wrapping) look here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/113605/ To make it work with modules I propose adding a driver bind event: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/113865/ Looks pretty multi-platform friendly to me. Any suggestions? Thanks, / magnus _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
