On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is because update_pm_runtime_accounting() doesn't take into > account the existence of the RPM_RESUMING and RPM_SUSPENDING states; > it treats them all the same as RPM_ACTIVE. this is by design fwiw; I'm considering the time spent going in and out of suspend as "active", it's a little on the conservative side, but the underlying assumption is that you're still burning power until you're really suspended. Better to be conservative and not count it as really suspended.... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
