On Saturday, July 03, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, July 02, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > > > This patch (as1404) makes the runtime_status sysfs attribute available > > > even in the absence of CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG, and it changes the > > > routine to display "unknown" when runtime PM is disabled for a device. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Maybe "unsupported" would be a little better than "unknown". What do > > > you think? > > > > I thought about that. "Unsupported" seems to suggest that the device/driver > > doesn't support runtime PM, whiile in fact it may be supported, although it's > > not enabled at the moment. > > Drivers that support runtime PM generally don't leave it disabled for > very long. IMO this wouldn't be terribly misleading. Well, whatever. I'm fine with that either way. Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
