On Monday, June 28, 2010, James Bottomley wrote: > Since every caller has to squirrel away the returned pointer anyway, > they might as well supply the memory area. This fixes a bug in a few of > the call sites where the returned pointer was dereferenced without > checking it for NULL (which gets returned if the kzalloc failed). > > I'd like to hear how sound and netdev feels about this: it will add > about two more pointers worth of data to struct netdev and struct > snd_pcm_substream .. but I think it's worth it. If you're OK, I'll add > your acks and send through the pm tree. > > This also looks to me like an android independent clean up (even though > it renders the request_add atomically callable). I also added include > guards to include/linux/pm_qos_params.h > > cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> I like all of the patches in this series, thanks a lot for doing this! I guess it might be worth sending a CC to the LKML next round so that people can see [1/3] (I don't expect any objections, but anyway it would be nice). Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
