On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:53:21 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 11:19 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:26 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > ... > > > > I *do* use freezable work-queue. > > > > > > I overlooked that, sorry. > > > > > > > However since this is pm notifier, it is called before userspace and the > > > > workqueue is frozen. > > > > Therefore I would like manually to freeze the workqueue from the pm > > > > notifier. > > > > > > No, that won't work. You need to find an alternative solution. I guess you > > > may insert a work item that's going to sleep until a condition is > > > satisfied (analogous to a workqueue barrier) and wait for it to > > This screams to be done in generic way. > > Something like suspend_workqueue() and resume_workqueue(); > > Well, there was no need for that until now. :-) > > > In addition to that I just found that .suspend function sometimes can > > return -ENOSYS, which triggers card removal. I wrongly remove that chunk > > of code. > > > > To make the thing picture perfect I would have to invest more time to > > it, I will do so as soon as I finish my exams. > > > > Meanwhile the current patch already fixes all but corner cases or rather > > nasty hang on suspend with any MMC/SD card inserted. > > OK > > I think Andrew has already taken [2/2]. I took them both, but I need to come back to this discussion to work out what to do with them now. > Andrew, who's maintaining MMC now? Pierre stopped doing it, so I'm now pretending to. I actually pretend to maintain a huge number of subsystems and should sprinkle akpms all over MAINTAINERS so stuff doesn't get lost. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
