On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, mark gross wrote: > Your confused about what problem this patch attempts to solve. I don't think so. Rafael's description was pretty clear. > There is > a pm_qos patch in the works to address the suspend blocker > functionality. > http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-June/026760.html No. That patch addresses something _similar_ to the suspend blocker functionality. The fact remains, though, that pm_qos is not used during system suspend (the /sys/power/state interface), hence changes to pm_qos won't solve the system-suspend problems that suspend blockers do solve. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
