RFC: /sys/power/policy_preference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Create /sys/power/policy_preference, giving user-space
the ability to express its preference for kernel based
power vs. performance decisions in a single place.

This gives kernel sub-systems and drivers a central place
to discover this system-wide policy preference.
It also allows user-space to not have to be updated
every time a sub-system or driver adds a new power/perf knob.

policy_preference has 5 levels, from max_performance
through max_powersave.  Here is how 4 parts of the kernel
might respond to those 5 levels:

max_performance (unwilling to sacrifice any performance)
	scheduler: default (optimized for performance)
	cpuidle: disable all C-states except polling mode
	ondemand: disable all P-states except max perf
	msr_ia32_energy_perf_bias: 0 of 15

performance (care primarily about performance)
	scheduler: default (optimized for performance)
	cpuidle: enable all C-states subject to QOS
	ondemand: all P-states, using no bias
	msr_ia32_energy_perf_bias: 3 of 15

balanced (default)
	scheduler: enable sched_mc_power_savings
	cpuidle: enable all C-states subject to QOS
	ondemand: all P-states, powersave_bias=5
	msr_ia32_energy_perf_bias: 7 of 15

powersave (can sacrifice measurable performance)
	scheduler: enable sched_smt_power_savings
	cpuidle: enable all C-states, subject to QOS
	ondemand: disable turbo mode, powersave_bias=10
	msr_ia32_energy_perf_bias: 11 of 15

max_powersave (can sacrifice significant performance)
	scheduler: enable sched_smt_power_savings
	cpuidle: enable all C-states, subject to QOS
	ondemand: min P-state (do not invoke T-states)
	msr_ia32_energy_perf_bias: 15 of 15

Note that today Linux is typically operating in the mode
called "performance" above, rather than "balanced",
which is proposed to be the default.  While a system
should work well if left in "balanced" mode, it is likely
that some users would want to use "powersave" when on
battery and perhaps shift to "performance" on A/C.

Please let me know what you think.

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux