On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:25:52 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Actually, pm_qos_remove now needs a flush_scheduled work since you don't > want to return until the list is clear (since the next action may be to > free the object). The work-items are allocated in the pm_qos objects (which get never freed), so we should be fine there. > > James > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
