On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 21:50 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, June 11, 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 21:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, June 11, 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > Just bisected it. > > > > > > > > I also tried linux-acpi-next/test, and no change. > > > > > > > > The sympthoms are that EC does't sent any GPEs, and therefore battery > > > > insert/removal events don't show up. > > > > > > > > It can be see by doing 'grep . /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/*' > > > > With regression the line is shown like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe1C: 1 enabled > > > > > > > > Without regression it is > > > > > > > > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe1C: 22889 enabled > > > > > > > > and steadily increasing. > > > > > > > > After suspend/resume, regression disappears. > > > > > > Hmm. > > > > > > Can you please apply the following patches: > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104903/ > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104912/ > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104909/ > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104911/ > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104910/ > > > > > > on top of current -git and see if the problem is still there? > > > > > > Rafael > > > > These patch don't apply nether on top of linus tree nor on top of > > acpi-test tree (which includes these?) > > Yes, acpi-test contains them, so you can test that tree. I'm not sure why > they don't apply on top of the Linus' tree, though. I was using acpi-next all the time, so these patches don't help. I partially reverted the guilty commit, and compile the kernel. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
