On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote: > > The power may not see the event, the process that reads the event will > always see it. If the power manager is not in the poll call when the > event happens, the process that reads the event can read the event > before the power manager calls poll. > > > All input events that can wake the system are handled by one > user-space suspend blocker. Input devices come and go so we would need > to add and remove the fds dynamically. > > For that to work the wakeup events would have to be reported to the > power manager in a reliable way in the first place. Passing the file > descriptor that the app uses to the power manager does not work for > this, since the app could read the event while the power manager was > not in the poll call and the power manager would never see it. Also, > existing apps don't pass their file descriptors to the power manager, > so it has the get the event from somewhere else. > why could the suspend blocker process see all events, but the power manager process not see the events? have the userspace talk to the power manager the way it does to the suspend blocker now and what's the difference? effectivly think s/suspend blocker/power manager/ (with the power manager doing all the other things that are proposed instead of grabbing the wakelock), the difference should be hidden to the rest of userspace. what am I missing here? David Lang _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
