Re: suspend blockers & Android integrationy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan,

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > #2 is a tad harder, as it requires to fix the trusted apps not to fire
> >    timers when there is nothing to do.
> 
> No; all you have to do is handle the trusted apps as though they were 
> untrusted -- just as in the original wakelock approach.
> 
> >    Though you can solve it with cgroups as well. The unfreeze problem
> >    for real wakeups can be solved as mhelsley pointed out somewhere
> >    else in this thread.
> > 
> > But that depends on user space changes ....
> 
> If you handle all the apps uniformly, very few userspace changes are
> needed.

Oh, I see. I misunderstood you. -ENOTENOUGHSLEEP
 
Thanks,

	Thomas
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux