On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, James Bottomley wrote: > > +int pm_qos_add_notifier_nonblocking(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier) > > Rightly or wrongly, the notifier people use atomic not nonblocking, so > we should really stick with it to avoid confusion. I'm afraid that's my fault. I used "atomic" because it's shorter and punchier than "nonblocking". It refers to the context in which the notifier chain may be called. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
