Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 06 June 2010, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 20:04, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
...
> > So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB
> > (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)?  Would it
> > be _that_ _much_ worse?
> 
> No it wouldn't be much worse. But there will still be some lagginess,
> some delay, some sort of annoying disk activity compared to NO delay,
> NO lagginess, in short, you have your computer _exactly_ the way you
> left it when you left it when you hibernated. And the difference is
> noticeable.

Well, have you actually tried that?

Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux