2010/6/2 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 01:54 -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: >> No I want you to stop confusing low power idle modes with suspend. > > I think it is you who is confused. For power management purposes suspend > is nothing more but a deep idle state. No, idle is transparent, suspend is not. > > (and please don't mention @#$@ up x86 ACPI again, Intel knows, they're > fixing it, get over it already). > I don't think it is realistic to drop support for all existing hardware. >> Unrelated to >> Android, I also want to use opportunistic suspend on my desktop. > > So you're going to sprinkle this suspend blocker shite all over regular > userspace? I have said several times, that regular user-space will not need to be modified to maintain their current behavior. > Why not instead work on getting apps to behave properly and > idle when there's nothing to do? > > After all, if you have the code to add suspend blockers into, you also > have the means to fix it being stupid in the first place. > Why would I add suspend blockers to the code I want to prevent running? -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
