Re: [RFC] lp_events: an lternitive to suspend blocker user mode and kernel API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/6/1 mark gross <640e9920@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:24:30PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:09 PM, mark gross <640e9920@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:45:21AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday 01 June 2010, mark gross wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:57:53AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
>> >> ...
>> >> > > So I would suggest modifying your proposal to simply create a new 'input'
>> >> > > device.  Any driver that supports wake-from-suspend queues an event to that
>> >> > > device when a wakeup event occurs.  If the device is open and has any queued
>> >> > > events, then a suspend request such as 'echo mem > /sys/power/state' completes
>> >> > > without going into full suspend.
>> >> >
>> >> > /me likes.
>> >> >
>> >> > > Then you just need to convince us that this mechanism can be used without any
>> >> > > race problems.  If it can, then it would certainly be a simple and
>> >> > > unobtrusive approach.
>> >> >
>> >> > Lets find out.
>> >>
>> >> Simple question: how is that better than the Alan Stern's proposed approach?
>> >>
>> > I just saw Alan Stern's proposal, and have gotten some input form some
>> > others.  I can't say my patch represents a better Idea than what Alan
>> > proposed.  However; what Alan (and Thomas) are talking about is
>> > effectively the same as the kenrel mode wakelock/suspend blocker thing,
>> > and although it reuses existing infrastructure, it doesn't solve the
>> > problem of needing overlapping blocking sections of code from ISR to
>> > user mode.
>> >
>>
>> I don't think your solution solves this either.
>
> Why?  my proposal effectively removes the overlapping kernel blocking
> sections uppon wake up by forcing the user mode to ack the wake event
> and re-issue the suspend request explicitly.  That pretty much solves
> that problem.
>

How to you ack the wakeup event in a safe way. Another wakeup event
can come in after you decided to ack the last event. Also when the
user-space power manager reads that there was a wakeup event, how does
it know if the real event has been delivered to user-space, and if the
user-space code that consumed this event has had a chance to block
suspend?

> We can talk about whether or not it can be used effectively with Android
> user mode PM or not, which I still think it can, but I need to try the
> mods to power.c.
>


-- 
Arve Hjønnevåg
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux