Hi. I like the sound of this much better too, but... On 30/05/10 08:13, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Alan Stern<stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There is no /sys/power/policy file. In place of opportunistic suspend, >> we have "QoS-based suspend". This is initiated by userspace writing >> "qos" to /sys/power/state, and it is very much like suspend-to-RAM. > > Why do you want to tie it to a specific state? I do agree here. I would suggest that all /sys/power/state possibilities should have a qos- equivalent. You might not want to use any or all of them, but they should be available. Regards, Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
