On Sat, 29 May 2010 00:11:32 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Having reconsidered the suspend blockers idea I came to the conclusion that > in fact it was a workaround for three different problems. But it is also a change of paradigm. The scheduler should strive to have the system idle as long as possible to conserve battery. And everything that does not serve the purpose of the device has to be considered as not worth running, except if there are other purpose-fullfilling tasks to run anyway. > > Thanks, > Rafael cheers, Flo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
