Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:23:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:09:49 +0100
> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > 
> > > This is I believe robust (and has been implemented on some non x86
> > > boxes). It depends on not forcing running tasks into suspend. That is the
> > > key.
> > 
> > We've already established that ACPI systems require us to force running 
> > tasks into suspend. How do we avoid the race in that situation?
> 
> Android phones do not have ACPI. Embedded platforms do not have ACPI. MID
> x86 devices do not have ACPI.

It doesn't matter. Right now there's a race condition in terms of 
wakeup events on ACPI systems. What's your proposal for fixing that?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux