On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:54 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:52:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > How so, event happens on hardware level, IRQ gets raised, CPU wakes up, > > handler gets run, handler generates a task wakeup, runqueue isn't empty, > > we run stuff. > > If you're using idle-based suspend without any forced idling or blocking > of applications then you don't lose wakeups. People keep conflating > separate issues. I still don't see how blocking applications will cause missed wakeups in anything but a buggy application at worst, and even those will eventually get the event when they unblock. What seems to be the confusion? _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
