On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:40:19 +0100 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:34:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > we still need to be able to enter suspend while the system isn't idle. > > > > _WHY_!? > > Because if I'm running a kernel build in a tmpfs and I hit the sleep > key, I need to go to sleep. Blocking processes on driver access isn't > sufficient. Suspend as an idle state Suspend as a 'hand of God' choice. One is a performance optimisation the other is an operator executive decision. I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ? _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
