On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > If that's what you're aiming for then you don't need to block > applications on hardware access because they should all already have > idled themselves. Correct, a well behaved app would have. I thought we all agreed that well behaved apps weren't the problem? > > Note that it doesn't need to broadcast this, it could opt to reply with > > that message on the first drawing attempt after it goes away and block > > on the second. > > That's more interesting, but you're changing semantics quite heavily at > this point. So? _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
