On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:06:23PM +0200, ext Alan Stern wrote: >If people don't mind, here is a greatly simplified summary of the >comments and objections I have seen so far on this thread: > > The in-kernel suspend blocker implementation is okay, even > beneficial. I disagree here. I believe expressing that as QoS is much better. Let the kernel decide which power state is better as long as I can say I need 100us IRQ latency or 100ms wakeup latency. -- balbi DefectiveByDesign.org _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
