On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:09:16 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:06 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > Opportunistic suspends are okay. > > > > The proposed userspace API is too Android-specific. > > I would argue opportunistic suspends are not ok, and therefore the > proposed API is utterly irrelevant. Assuming you are happy that opportunistically entering C6 and the like is ok via ACPI can you explain why you have a problem with opportunistic suspend and why it is different to a very deep sleep CPU state such as we have now (and which on many embedded platforms we deal with *is* sleeping external devices too) Alan _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
