2010/5/27 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Really, what are you getting at? Do you deny that there are programs, >>> that prevent a device from sleeping? (Just think of the bouncing >>> cows app) >>> >>> And if you have two kernels, one with which your device is dead after 1 >>> hour and one with which your device is dead after 10 hours. Which would >>> you prefer? I mean really... this is ridiculous. >> >> The problem you have is that this is policy. If I have the device wired >> to a big screen and I want cows bouncing on it I'll be most upset if >> instead it suspends. > > We never suspend when the screen is on. If the screen is off, I would > not be upset if it suspends. That's /wrong/. What if you have an active download ongoing when the screen is off? This ugly simplistic approach is one of the worst things in Android. ~Vitaly _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
