On Wed, 26 May 2010 17:15:47 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:11 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > > I'm not saying that your argument is not valid. But why don't you look > > at suspend blockers as a contract between userspace and kernelspace? An > > Opt-In to the current guarantees the kernel provides in the non-suspend > > case. > > That's backwards. I think that's the point of it. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
