On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:11 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > > Implementation-wise it probably ties into setpidle, its simply that a task > > has a pair of idle values, a dynamic one and a base one, the dynamic one > > being the base one but updatable temporarily by drivers. > How does this address the loss of wakeup events while using suspend? > (For example the 2 issues formulated by Alan Stern in [1]) By not suspending obviously. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
