On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:19:42 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is a _big_ plus for attracting 3rd party programs. (And of course > > the thing you don't like). > > You would do better to concentrate on technical issues that the > assignment of malicious intent to other parties. > > Alan This was nothing the kind of! He explicitly said this: On Wed, 26 May 2010 15:29:32 +0300 Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What I find ridiculous is the assumption that kernel should provide good > power management even for badly written applications. They should work, > of course, but there's no assumption that the kernel should cope with > those applications and provide good battery usage on those cases. And I responded that if the kernel would do this, then that would be a "_big_ plus for attracting 3d party programs". I had no intent in attacking anyone or putting word's in someones mouth. Sorry if this was unclearly written. Cheers, Flo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
