[GIT PULL] Opportunistic suspend from Google for 2.6.35

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Linus,

Please consider pulling the Google's opportunistic suspend patches from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/suspend-2.6.git opsuspend

This is contentious, but in my opinion, at this point, it's as good as it gets.

Quite a number of people don't like the idea, which is understandable, because
this stuff is kind of blunt.  However, it really helps the Android people to
deal with a problem we have no other working alternative solution for, ie.
maximizing battery life in the presence of arbitrarily badly designed
applications.

Some alternative approaches have been proposed during the on-going discussion,
but they are general ideas rather than specific technical propositions, and
until someone actually tries to implement them it's not really  known
whether or not they are suitable for Android.  For this reason I don't think
we can realistically expect Google to implement any of them.  Thus, in my view,
we have a choice to either accept or reject this feature altogether.

Now, if the feature is rejected, I don't think it will cause Google to
abandon this approach and go for one we'd prefer.  Instead, I expect that
Google will continue to use it and it's going to be put into more and more
Android device drivers in that case.  As a result, these drivers won't be
submitted for mainline inclusion and the divergence between the mainline and
Android kernel trees will only increase over time.  Also, Android users won't
be able to use the mainline kernel without major modifications on their
systems, which won't be a good thing.

On the other hand, if the feature is accepted, we'll have to live with it,
which may turn out to be difficult in the long run.

To conclude, I see more reasons to merge it than to reject it, but they are not
purely technical, so I don't feel like I'm in position to make this decision.
If you think this code is too ugly to live, please let me know.  If you think
it's worth merging, please merge.  :-)


 Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt          |    3 +-
 Documentation/power/opportunistic-suspend.txt |  156 ++++++
 include/linux/suspend.h                       |    1 +
 include/linux/suspend_blocker.h               |  166 +++++++
 include/linux/suspend_ioctls.h                |    4 +
 kernel/power/Kconfig                          |   31 ++
 kernel/power/Makefile                         |    2 +
 kernel/power/main.c                           |  132 +++++-
 kernel/power/opportunistic_suspend.c          |  639 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/power/power.h                          |   14 +
 kernel/power/process.c                        |   11 +-
 kernel/power/suspend.c                        |    5 +-
 kernel/power/user_suspend_blocker.c           |  143 ++++++
 13 files changed, 1296 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

---------------

Arve Hjønnevåg (6):
      PM: Opportunistic suspend support
      PM: Add driver to access suspend blockers from user space
      PM: Abort task freezing if there is an active suspend blocker
      PM: Add debugfs file for suspend blockers
      PM: Report statistics for suspend blockers
      PM: Introduce suspend blocking work

Rafael J. Wysocki (1):
      PM: Fix build with CONFIG_SUSPEND unset

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux