On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > And btw I do have wakelock-less implementation of autosleep, that only > sleeped the machine when nothing was ready to run. It was called > "sleepy linux". Should I dig it out? As has been explained several times now, that's not equivalent. The difference is what makes this a hard problem. If a usecase is valid and nobody can come up with a convincing explanation of what an elegant solution would look like, then the ugly solution wins. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
