On Monday 17 May 2010, mgross wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:21:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday 15 May 2010, mgross wrote: > > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:38:47PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Saturday 15 May 2010, mgross wrote: > > > > > I apologize for the goofy email address. > > > > > > > > > > The following is a fix for the crash reported by Valdis. > > > > > > > > > > The problem was that the original pm_qos silently fails when a request > > > > > update is passed to a parameter that has not been added to the list > > > > > yet. It seems that the e1000e is doing this. This update restores this > > > > > behavior. > > > > > > > > > > I need to think about how to better handle such abuse, but for now this > > > > > restores the original behavior. > > > > > > > > Can you please post a signed-off incremental patch against > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/suspend-2.6.git for-llinus > > > > > > > > that contains your original PM QOS update? > > > > > > No problem: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: markgross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks! Do you want to use this address for the sign-off or the Intel one? > > I guess so. Ever since switching groups within intel last summer my > mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx address isn't checked as often as this one. > > The other option is to use my outlook email (mark.gross@xxxxxxxxx), but > I really hate posting from outlook. Besides, doing upstream kernel > stuff isn't my day job any more so using markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx makes > sense to me. Good. Patch applied to suspend-2.6/for-linus. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
