On Thu, 13 May 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Some comments on the opportunistic suspend portion of this patch. ... > While reading the patch, it seemed that this opportunistic suspend > mechanism is a degenerate case of a system-wide form of CPUIdle. I'll > call it "SystemIdle," for lack of a better term. The footnotes for this E-mail were inadvertently omitted. Sorry about that. They are: 1. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c;h=3d3d035db9aff62ce522e0080e570cfdbf8e70cc;hb=4462dc02842698f173f518c1f5ce79c0fb89395a#l292 2. OMAP35x Technical Reference Manual Rev. F, section 4.7.5.2 "System Clock Oscillator Control": http://www.ti.com/litv/pdf/spruf98f _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
