On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:33:58PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote: > > > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg KH > > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:47 PM > > > Also note that such a driver, without wakelocks, would never get tested, > > and so, things start quickly diverging. > > Do wakelock enabled drivers require a wakelock aware user space to > function properly? Not that I can tell, but others might know more. > If the driver is added you want to make sure the benefit is there and > testable for all userspaces. Agreed. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
