On Thu, 13 May 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > And that's why > > > it should be handled by runtime power management instead. > > > > Runtime PM is not capable of freezing userspace and shutting down CPUs. > > More or less by definition -- if it could then it wouldn't be "runtime" > > any more, since the processor wouldn't be running. > > Not true. We are already powering off CPUs and rebooting them for > at least omaps in every idle loop using cpuidle. The memory stays on. Okay, that's a valid point. But is that approach usable in general (i.e., on non-OMAP systems)? How do you handle situations where the CPU is currently idle but an event (such as I/O completion) is expected to occur in the near future? You don't want to power-off and reboot then, do you? Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
