* Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> [100513 13:03]: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 01:00:04PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > The system stays running because there's something to do. The system > > won't suspend until all the processors hit the kernel idle loop and > > the next_timer_interrupt_critical() returns nothing. > > At which point an application in a busy loop cripples you. Maybe you could deal with the misbehaving untrusted apps in the userspace by sending kill -STOP to them when the screen blanks? Then continue when some event wakes up the system again. > I think we could implement your suggestion more easily by just giving > untrusted applications an effectively infinite amount of timer slack, > but it still doesn't handle the case where an app behaves excrutiatingly > badly. Hmm, if you use timer slack then you still need to search through the whole timer list instead of a smaller critical timer list. Both ways sound doable though. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm