On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 11:17 -0700, Brian Swetland wrote: > > I'm not sure this necessitates using only debugfs for the userspace > interface. A userspace interface is necessary to accomplish what > we're trying to do here, otherwise we have only half a solution, and > our hope is that it'd be a stable interface (as userspace interfaces > are supposed to be) for as long as its needed. I could totally > imagine the userspace interface eventually becoming a no-op or > punching through to some other facility, depending on how this problem > is solved long-term in the ideal post-suspend-block future. The problem is that once this userspace interface is exposed, it's nearly permanent and has to be support for a long long time .. It might seen trivial to just remove something your not using, but we never know who is using what once the kernel is released. Daniel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
