On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:36:33AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > OK, so can the suspend blocker then become just: > > # Block suspend while idle, system stays running > # echo default > /sys/power/policy > > and the when it's OK to suspend: > > # Allow suspend while idle, system suspends when it hits kernel idle loop > # echo opportunistic > /sys/power/policy > > or do you still need something more to ensure the data gets into your > app and be handled? Yes. You still need suspend blocks. > The part I really don't like is the idea of patching all over the drivers > and userspace for the wakelocks/suspendblocks. I don't like the idea either, but given that nobody has actually provided any other ideas that would actually work then I don't think we've got a great deal of choice. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
