On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:31:17PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:40:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote: > > > From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail > > > so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the > > > power management freezer code. > > > > I guess these three patches are for me. > > > > Do you want me to handle them? > > > > Rafael > > Hi Rafael, > > I think you can take 15 as it's an update to the comments. > > 16 and 17 are specific to checkpoint/restart. There are no other in-kernel > uses, that we've identified, for them. So I was under the impression that it's > inappropriate to add them without also adding the checkpoint/restart patches > that use them. Of course, assuming I'm wrong about the dependency on checkpoint/restart, I have no objection to your taking them. Thanks again! Cheers, -Matt Helsley _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
