On Tue, 4 May 2010, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > Bruno, could you, for testing purposes, check, whether the patch below
> > changes the behavior you are seeing (and also check what the actual return
> > value from device_add() was, see the added printk()).
>
> Well, it's said to return 0:
>
> [ 286.872739] generic-usb 0003:058F:9462.0003: input: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [Multimedia USB Keyboard Multimedia USB Keyboard] on usb-0000:00:13.0-2.1/input0
> [ 286.890136] HID: device_add() returned 0
>
> [ 286.919698] generic-usb: probe of 0003:058F:9462.0004 failed with error -22
> [ 286.929363] HID: device_add() returned 0
>
> or with debug=1 for HID:
> [ 559.982958] /usr/src/linux-2.6-git/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c: HID probe called for ifnum 1
> [ 560.011698] /usr/src/linux-2.6-git/drivers/hid/hid-core.c: usage index exceeded
> [ 560.011704] /usr/src/linux-2.6-git/drivers/hid/hid-core.c: hid_add_usage failed
> [ 560.011710] /usr/src/linux-2.6-git/drivers/hid/hid-core.c: item 0 2 2 2 parsing failed
> [ 560.011732] /usr/src/linux-2.6-git/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c: parsing report descriptor failed
> [ 560.011747] generic-usb: probe of 0003:058F:9462.0006 failed with error -22
> [ 560.021718] HID: device_add() returned 0
Could you please verify with this patch? Thanks.
drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
index 2e2aa75..8df19d3 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
@@ -1486,8 +1486,10 @@ static int hid_device_probe(struct device *dev)
if (!ret)
ret = hid_hw_start(hdev, HID_CONNECT_DEFAULT);
}
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
hdev->driver = NULL;
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ }
}
return ret;
}
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
