On Sunday 02 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hmm. It doesn't seem to be possible to create two different suspend blockers > > using the same file handle. So, what exactly is a process supposed to do to > > use two suspend blockers at the same time? > > Open the file twice, thereby obtaining two file handles. Well, that's what I thought. I must admit I'm not really comfortable with this interface. IMO it would be better if _open() created the suspend blocker giving it a name based on the name of the process that called it. Something like "<process name>_<timestamp>" might work at first sight. Alternatively, "<process_name><number>", where <number> is 0 for the first suspend blocker created by the given process, 1 for the second one etc., also seems to be doable. Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
