On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 04/28/2010 09:40 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> +int schedule_suspend_blocking_work(struct suspend_blocking_work *work)
> >> +{
> >> ...
> >> + ret = schedule_work(&work->work);
> >
> > Off-topic. We should probably export keventd_wq to avoid the duplications
> > like this.
>
> Yeah, had about the same thought. cmwq exports it so I didn't suggest
> it at this point but then again we don't really know whether or when
> that series is going in
As soon as there are no major objections. At least to my tree.
> so it might be a good idea to make that change now. Hmm...
I'd rather like a follow-up patch changing that, if poss.
Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
