2010/4/23 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 04/23/10 20:23, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: >> 2010/4/23 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:08:54 -0700 Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: >>> >>>> Report active and inactive suspend blockers in >>>> /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_blockers. >>> >>> >>> This looks more like user interface information than it does debug information. >>> If that's correct, it shouldn't be in debugfs. >> >> Where should it be? It is not allowed in sysfs, and procfs does not >> appear to be open to new files. > > Why is it not allowed in sysfs? due to more than one value per file Yes. > or something else? > > I don't think that procfs is closed to new files, but you may have to > justify why it should be used. > I used procfs in the original version and there were a lot of objections to this, so I moved it to debugfs. -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
