2010/4/23 Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, [UTF-8] Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: ... >> +Calling suspend_block when the suspend blocker is active or suspend_unblock when >> +it is not active has no effect. This allows drivers to update their state and >> +call suspend suspend_block or suspend_unblock based on the result. > > But suspend_block() and suspend_unblock() don't nest. You should > mention this. > I'm not sure what you mean by this? I think the first sentence dictates nesting is not supported. I think the rest of your comments will be addressed in the next version of the document, that I worked with Rafael on. -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
