On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:57:51AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:53:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:42:50PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Change the default implementation to the standard pm_generic_runtime > > > one, allowing drivers to use runtime PM without per-architecture > > > changes. > > > That's nice, but it breaks the build on my system: > > CC drivers/base/platform.o > > drivers/base/platform.c: In function ???platform_pm_runtime_suspend???: > > drivers/base/platform.c:970: error: implicit declaration of function ???pm_generic_runtime_suspend??? > > drivers/base/platform.c: In function ???platform_pm_runtime_resume???: > > drivers/base/platform.c:975: error: implicit declaration of function ???pm_generic_runtime_resume??? > > drivers/base/platform.c: In function ???platform_pm_runtime_idle???: > > drivers/base/platform.c:980: error: implicit declaration of function ???pm_generic_runtime_idle??? > > make[1]: *** [drivers/base/platform.o] Error 1 > > make: *** [_module_drivers/base] Error 2 > > > Care to fix it up? > > This depends on "PM: Provide generic subsystem-level callbacks" which is > in Linus' tree - which kernel version are you building against and with > what config? Things work fine for me in -next... I was using Linus's latest tree as of yesterday when this failed. Are you relying on something in -next that is not in Linus's tree? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
