>From nobody Tue Apr 20 22:00:38 2010 From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pm list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.34] Suspend fails in pm_test=processor on Dell laptop In-Reply-To: <201004200533.13219.rjw@xxxxxxx> References: <4bcb1cf2.116bdc0a.2008.6f5a@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201004200533.13219.rjw@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:11:52 -0400 Message-ID: <87633mey6f.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:33:13 +0200, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sunday 18 April 2010, Ben Gamari wrote: [snip] > > It seems that something in the 2.6.34 merge cycle has broken suspend to RAM on > > my Dell Latitude D830. While suspend has been rock solid for several release > > cycles, as of 2.6.34-rc4 it locks up on suspend. All of the pm_test options up > > to processor work fine, precluding a driver issue. > > Hmm, does the "processors" work? Nope. Processors is the first failing phase. I'm still working on getting a bisection, but it'll be a few more days due to various school-related delays. - Ben _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
