On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@xxxxxxxxxxx> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@xxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@xxxxxxxxx> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd? That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537 as far as I can see. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@xxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. Al? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@xxxxxxxxxx> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this, but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) Duplicate entry. See above. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc. Linus _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
