On Saturday 27 March 2010, Mark Brown wrote: > On 26 Mar 2010, at 22:35, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Friday 26 March 2010, Mark Brown wrote: > >> Currently the default runtime PM callbacks for platform devices > >> return > >> -ENOSYS, preventing the use of runtime PM platforms until they have > >> provided at least a default implementation. This hinders the use of > >> runtime PM by devices which work with many platforms such as memory > >> mapped devices, MFDs and on chip IPs shared by multiple > >> architectures. > >> > >> Change the default implementation to the standard pm_generic_runtime > >> one, allowing drivers to use runtime PM without per-architecture > >> changes. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > Is it very urgent? > > Not especially - worst case you just don't get devices suspending > which isn't the end of the world and there's no build time > dependencies introduced. OK, so I guess it will be sufficient if Greg queues it for .35. Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
