Hi. On 26/03/10 07:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 25 March 2010, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> Hi. >> >> On 25/03/10 16:30, Pavel Machek wrote: >> [...] >> >>> I have some problems with sws_module_ops interface (handcoded locking >>> is too ugly to live), but it is better than I expected. But there may >>> be better solution available, one that does not need two interfaces to >>> maintain (we can't really get rid of userland interface). What about >>> this? >> >> Just picking up on that bracketed part: Can we flag the userland >> interface (and uswsusp) as being planned for eventual removal now... or >> at least agree to work toward that? > > No, we can't. > >> I'm asking because if we're going to make a go of getting the in-kernel >> code in much better shape, and we have Rafael, Jiri and I - and you? - >> all pulling in the same direction to improve it, there's going to come a >> point (hopefully not too far away) where uswsusp is just making life too >> difficult, and getting rid of it will be a big help. > > We're not dropping user space interfaces used by every distro I know of. So what's your long term plan then? Regards, Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
